Proposal “DCG-SUPPLEMENTAL-2-DEC-24“ (Active)Back
| Title: | Dash Core Group December Supplemental Funding Proposal #2 |
| Owner: | quantumexplorer |
| One-time payment: | 175 DASH (6321 USD) |
| Completed payments: | no payments occurred yet (1 month remaining) |
| Payment start/end: | 2024-12-08 / 2025-01-07 (added on 2024-12-14) |
| Votes: | 470 Yes / 72 No / 11 Abstain |
| Will be funded: | Yes |
|
Manually vote on this proposal (DashCore - Tools - Debugconsole): gobject vote-many ac1344772c95fba0badc620b971201f2952d6b5e5b49f479531111bf4d07fea5 funding yes Please login or create a new DashCentral account for comfortable one button voting! | |
Proposal description
What does this specific proposal fund?
While the price of Dash has considerably risen our reserves are still very low as they will take multiple months to increase. Last month some contributors agreed to temporary pay cuts and some others were working less hours, and some both of these things. I would like to thank everyone that made sacrifices for the project. The primary reason for this proposal is to get DCG in a better financial position as soon as possible.
Why are there two supplementals this month?
Generally for supplementals I take into account which proposals I think have a chance of passing and which have already been turned down. In this cycle I am just quite unsure about AJ's proposals. Hence we decided to make two supplementals to give MNO's greater flexibility in their voting choices.
What's coming up for Evo?
I am hard at work on token support, which I believe should be out in January as previously stated.
DCG is also focusing on SDKs, and we will provide a roadmap for the SDK within the next few weeks.
If you have any questions, please direct them to quantumexplorer at dashcentral.
Requested funding is as follows for the December 22nd superblock:
While the price of Dash has considerably risen our reserves are still very low as they will take multiple months to increase. Last month some contributors agreed to temporary pay cuts and some others were working less hours, and some both of these things. I would like to thank everyone that made sacrifices for the project. The primary reason for this proposal is to get DCG in a better financial position as soon as possible.
Why are there two supplementals this month?
Generally for supplementals I take into account which proposals I think have a chance of passing and which have already been turned down. In this cycle I am just quite unsure about AJ's proposals. Hence we decided to make two supplementals to give MNO's greater flexibility in their voting choices.
What's coming up for Evo?
I am hard at work on token support, which I believe should be out in January as previously stated.
DCG is also focusing on SDKs, and we will provide a roadmap for the SDK within the next few weeks.
If you have any questions, please direct them to quantumexplorer at dashcentral.
Requested funding is as follows for the December 22nd superblock:
- 174 Dash ($7,830.00 USD @ $45 per Dash)
- 1 Dash Proposal fee reimbursement
Show full description ...
Discussion: Should we fund this proposal?
Submit comment
|
No comments so far?
Be the first to start the discussion! |