Welcome!

The DCG has coded a buggy protocol that takes into account the votes of the POSE_BANNED masternodes, while they are not taken into account when calculating the electorate (and thus the 10% of it). Absurd, isnt it?

As long as this proposal barely fails or passes, below you can see the correct voting outcome of the 10% Net Votes election method :

https://mnowatch.org/votethenumbers/votethenumbers3/calc3.php?proposals%5B%5D=DCD-general-development

According to the latest report:
Net Votes ( Yes votes 2 - No Votes 0 ) = 460 - 152 = 308 ( 9.53 % of the electorate)

That´s pretty shitty from DCG if your accusation turns out to be true, that they allow proposals to get approved without reaching 10% votes of ACTIVE masternodes

Demo is not describing the scenario adequately. The situation is, if your (e)MN goes into PoSe Ban status, its prior cast votes are not cleared. Note the MNO cannot cast new votes due to the ban.


Demo is advocating for a PoSe banned node to have its votes cleared, this sucks, because for me my nodes get PoSe banned all the time, and do not wish to recast those already cast votes when I clear it.


Also, please note in case you spend the collateral, all votes are instantly wiped.

>Demo is advocating for a PoSe banned node to have its votes cleared,

I am not advocating this. I am advocating LOGIC !

THE BUDGET PROPOSALS ARE PASSING AND ARE BEING PAID BY TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE VOTES OF THE POSE_BANNED MASTERNODES, WHICH VOTES DO NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE CALCULATION OF 10% THRESHOLD!!!!

Read here :

https://www.dash.org/forum/threads/bug-report-should-the-votes-of-a-former-masternode-that-just-keeps-his-collateral-be-counted.53370/#post-236487

What I advocated was this:

https://www.dash.org/forum/threads/bug-report-should-the-votes-of-a-former-masternode-that-just-keeps-his-collateral-be-counted.53370/#post-236501

The electorate should be defined as "all the ENABLED masternodes in addition to the POSE_BANNED masternodes that casted at least one vote in any proposal".

Yes, we've all had nodes PoSe banned without us knowing why. We don't want those votes to just get removed. Often people revive their nodes pretty quickly.

Both lysergic and quantumexplorer, τhey are lying to you, @Tekken!

Is UdjinM6 a stupid who tried to fix the bug?
He is not, they are!

Read here:

https://www.dash.org/forum/threads/bug-report-should-the-votes-of-a-former-masternode-that-just-keeps-his-collateral-be-counted.53370/#post-236487

and here:

https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5583

quantumexplorer , the responsible of merging UdjinM6's solution, denies to do it.

Here you can see the POSE_BANNED masternodes, what they voted

https://mnowatch.org/latestlink_theresultsdashd.html?0=POSE_BANNED

in the above page, Ctrl+F and search for DCD-general-development, in order to discover the false votes.

Here you can see the effort of Udjinm6 to solve the problem

https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5583

They didnt merge it yet, did they?

The masternodes who vote NO for this proposal.

https://mnowatch.org/latestlink_DashdUniqueHashVotes.html?4=DCD-general-development

No one among them, until now, voted for or against ENCOINTER_JAN25

This is because most of the NO voters for this proposal are hiding in Crowdnode.

>No one among them, until now, voted for or against ENCOINTER_JAN25
>This is because most of the NO voters for this proposal are hiding in Crowdnode.

So I am afraid we will have a big NO from the Crowd to the Encointer JAN25, as they did in the OCT24 proposal. Because the agents are hiding in the crowd.

The agents are hiding in the crowdnodes, but we will find them, when we will start developing more crowdnodewatch.

Also I think that the Masternodes who in the future will pass a proof of personhood test (through Encointer ofr whatever), should decide to seize some of the voting rights of whatever masternode is an agent (didnt pass a proof of personhood)

But also seize some of the voting rights of whatever Crowdnode masternodes is populated by agents.

Of course these improvements require a lot of coding.
The good proposals in the Dash Budget are always subverted by the agents since Dash's beginning.
Only the shit is allowed by them to float.
So the good proposals will never be funded.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gkWt0fWneY

So you should search the Crowd to discover the reason of the failure of this

https://mnowatch.org/crowdnodewatch/

If you cannot find what you want, you may tip the mnowatch developers to develop a filter for you, similar to this: https://mnowatch.org/crowdnodewatchdemo/

Good luck with this, voting Yes

Are you Nuts? THERE IS NO LUCK!!!!

Everything in the universe depends on voting!!!

I am supporting both your proposals, good luck !

Who are you trying to convince here?

Dont you understand that the Dash is OCCUPIED by government agents?

THERE ARE NO REAL PEOPLE HERE!!!!

leave this place asap.