Proposal “DCD-JS-SDK-platform-support“ (Closed)Back

Title:DCD JS SDK platform support
Owner:digitalcashdev
Monthly amount: 200 DASH (4598 USD)
Completed payments: 2 totaling in 400 DASH (1 month remaining)
Payment start/end: 2024-12-27 / 2025-03-28 (added on 2025-01-12)
Votes: 562 Yes / 112 No / 20 Abstain
External information: digitalcash.dev/proposals/dcd-platform-js-sdk/

Proposal description

I'm submitting two proposals:

  1. DCD JS SDK platform support (this one) - 200 DASH/month for 3 months
  2. DCD general development - 200 DASH/month for 3 months
I have several ideas for how I can add value in Dash, but I want to work on whatever the network wants me to prioritize.

I am confident I can make good progress on adding Platform support to our Dash SDK.

If the network would like me to work on this please vote for DCD JS SDK platform support (this one).

If the network would like to defer to my judgement please vote on DCD general development.

I am happy to have both pass, in which case I can allocate close to full-time and/or build a reserve which I can draw on when the network needs my support with anything.

Show full description ...

Discussion: Should we fund this proposal?

Submit comment
 
3 points,3 months ago
What is the reasoning behind the No votes here?
(other than them all being government agents of course, lol)
Reply
0 points,3 months ago
I personally thought it would be a waste of resources as I know the difficulty involved and would have liked to see people instead focus on writing DAPPs.
Reply
1 point,3 months ago
How did you feel about their other proposal?
Reply
-1 point,3 months ago
We are supposed to writr code for MONEY, so formaly verificating the code and have reproducable builting is essentiual and crutial.

The Platform is distributed through the docker which does not allow reproducable builts. And Javascript is not a language that can be formally verified.

So why vote for this proposal?
Reply
7 points,3 months ago
I would like this to pass. I'm busy onboarding companies to build on Evolutio, and right now there's no good tools for them to do so. I understand that DCG is working on an SDK as well, but having another one (especially native JS) could make it easier for a different subset of businesses to build on Dash.

My two cents.
Reply
6 points,3 months ago
We need this to pass so we have competing JS SDKs. JS SDKs will initially be the only way that DAPP developers can access Evo's features and one more option in SDK accessibility could prove to be valuable.
Reply
5 points,3 months ago
Gotta get on this SDK thing even if there will be two. In my eyes, this is a back up plan in case DCG runs into problems that take an extra quarter.
Hopefully DCG can also glean insight from some of the work??
NOTE: DCG will have a more secure and integrated SDK that will link into platform better, I know this but the SDK is needed so badly for developers to interact with platform and we have interest in using Dash Platform now. Let’s feed that interest now!
Reply
2 points,2 months ago
We really need that JS SDK to deliver more and more dApps for the public.
Reply
5 points,3 months ago
Yes from me.
Reply
5 points,3 months ago
Hello,
I’m a government agent. And I’m a real person (yes, it’s possible).
And of course I’m voting yes!
Reply
3 points,3 months ago
Please get the FED to buy up DASH till the price is at 30k, I mean, that won’t take a drop in a bucket compared to how much they’re printing off our backs!
Reply
4 points,3 months ago
Strong yes. Good luck!
Reply
4 points,3 months ago
I am supporting both your proposals, good luck !
Reply
-7 points,3 months ago
Who are you trying to convince here?

Dont you understand that the Dash is OCCUPIED by government agents?

THERE ARE NO REAL PEOPLE HERE!!!!

leave this place asap.
Reply
-5 points,3 months ago
Having said that, let me clarify my personal opinion on your project.

Both Dash Platform AND Javascript language sucks.

You only tiny hope, WASM.
Reply
-4 points,3 months ago
You are writing code for MONEY, so formaly verificating your code and reproducable builting your code is essentiual and crutial.

The Platform is disctributed through the docker, and Javascript is not a language that can be formally verified.

Stop being an amateur, stop misleading the remaing honest voters here (because the majority is the government agents)
Reply